News: Tons of TT
#1
Posted 23 January 2013 - 03:56 AM
Next up, Game Informer has... Well, quite a lot of stuff, really. First up is a history of TT's partnership with LEGO, which is fairly interesting, and also contains some brief footage from classic games like Island Xtreme Stunts. There's also an article on co-op in TT LEGO games, and a video showing the animation of the Hulk in LEGO form. Finally, there's a video showing the development of LEGO Marvel Super Heroes, and a developer's thoughts on LEGO The Lord of the Rings.
Sources:
#2
Posted 23 January 2013 - 11:02 AM
#3
Posted 24 January 2013 - 01:01 AM
THE BOAT, SILLY!
#4
Posted 24 January 2013 - 04:18 AM
#5
Posted 24 January 2013 - 01:40 PM
In one of the newer LEGO Club mags (Sept-Oct '12 or Nov-Dec '12), thre is a map of LEGO City as shown in Undercover. In the corner of the map is a small island that is barely connected to the main land: LEGO Island. In their video bios, both Nick and Laura Brick once patrolled in a big city (LEGO City) before presumably being transfered to LEGO Island. In Mama's video, it shows her as a young lady, getting off a boat in a large city with lots of people, carrying a bag with her (as is this girl). Then add the L.E.G.O. Radio announcer saying that the Brickolini's Zillionth anniv. party was a huge sucess, and you've got the Informainac declaring to that girl "Hello, Mama!"
Now if in this game they show that same girl involved with a piano in any way, be it in the fore- or background of a cutscene or gameplay, be it buying a new piano ("Mine broke"), watching a piano being hoisted by ropes, or picking up/carrying around piano pieces, it means that TT Games does have a heart, and did read the LEGO Island script, and that is an absolutely confirmed Mama.
#6
Posted 24 January 2013 - 04:48 PM
#7
Posted 24 January 2013 - 08:03 PM
I'm sorry to say, I don't think I have enough faith in TT Games to think that this was a deliberate LEGO Island reference. Nor do I have enough faith to believe that there will be any deliberate LEGO Island references in the whole game. Maybe I'm just pessimistic, but it seems like LEGO doesn't remember LEGO Island anymore.
They have Legend of Zelda sound effects and Super Mario warp pipes, but still no sign of the one and only Brickster in a LEGO "cops & robbers" game? Come on! Soccer Mania had nothing to do with LEGO Island (discounting Captain Click's unexpected cameo appearance in the flesh... err, bone), and the Brickster was the main villain! Heck, you could call this guy "the Brickster", and I'd be cool with that because he's got a beanie cap, domino mask, mustache, grin, jail stripes, and black pants... and LEGO completely missed that opportunity.
#8
Posted 24 January 2013 - 08:17 PM
*cough*Maybe I'm just pessimistic, but it seems like LEGO doesn't remember LEGO Island anymore.
*cough*
*cough*
*cough*
Also, don't forget all the Adventurers cameos Indiana Jones had, and all the throwbacks to old themes in LEGO Rock Band, and the cameos of classic LEGO space ships in LEGO Star Wars 2/TCS, and the Space Port astronaut cameo in LSW TCS, and the classic town sets appearing in the various "LEGO City" bonus levels. TT Games actually has quite a history of referencing past themes in their games.
#9
Posted 24 January 2013 - 08:38 PM
I'm not sure which is more ironic. The fact that I had to convince you that the LEGO Universe Sky Lane was the same Sky Lane that we all knew and loved (this was shortly before they updated Johnny Thunder to the classic textures), or the fact that you're using several images from my own majhost gallery as a counter argument to my statement. Well played.*cough*
*cough*
*cough*
*cough*
Also, don't forget all the Adventurers cameos Indiana Jones had, and all the throwbacks to old themes in LEGO Rock Band, and the cameos of classic LEGO space ships in LEGO Star Wars 2/TCS, and the Space Port astronaut cameo in LSW TCS, and the classic town sets appearing in the various "LEGO City" bonus levels. TT Games actually has quite a history of referencing past themes in their games.
But old sets appearing in TT Games are little more than cameos. It's not like in LEGO Battles (which doesn't count as TT Games because it was developed by Hellbent instead), which has entire factions of Islanders and Ninjas. From what we've seen so far of LEGO City: Undercover, it's all an original cast of characters, with preexisting character cameos being limited to those from the very-recent Minfiigures series (although, the Minifigures series does make quite a few references to older LEGO lines, but I suspect that whoever's writing the character bios must be an AFOL well-versed in LEGO history, as opposed to just a game designer).
#10
Posted 24 January 2013 - 09:47 PM
It also showed real humans in that video. Plus, I doubt that LEGO Island takes place "zillions" of years after this game.. In Mama's video, it shows her as a young lady, getting off a boat in a large city with lots of people, carrying a bag with her (as is this girl).
#11
Posted 24 January 2013 - 10:39 PM
So...when are they going to give up on the over-priced gimmick that is the Wii U?
You know, this sounds vaguely familiar to what people said about the Wii and DS.
#12
Posted 25 January 2013 - 10:21 PM
But the Wii and DS did not have the first major original LEGO game in a decade only on that console (excluding LEGO Battles) despite almost every other game being omni-platform, and they didn't have that touchscreen...You know, this sounds vaguely familiar to what people said about the Wii and DS.
#13
Posted 25 January 2013 - 10:27 PM
lol specifically excluding a game that would otherwise break your point entirelyBut the Wii and DS did not have the first major original LEGO game in a decade only on that console (excluding LEGO Battles) despite almost every other game being omni-platform, and they didn't have that touchscreen... thing.
Also, the basic idea of the DS (Dual Screen) was to add a touchscreen in addition to the already existing standard screen. And like it or not, the basic idea of the Wii U is to do the same thing but on a console.
#14
Posted 25 January 2013 - 10:30 PM
lol specifically excluding a game that would otherwise break your point entirely
It doesn't really break my point because Battles wasn't as much as a super major game like LCU (or maybe it was, but I never viewed it as such compared to a game that reminds me much of many classic games) and handheld stuff is cheaper. Plus,
the basic idea of the Wii U is to do the same thing but on a console.
This is exactly what is wrong with it.
#15
Posted 25 January 2013 - 10:31 PM
You know, this sounds vaguely familiar to what people said about the Wii and DS.
And still doesn't change the fact that both are rubbish.
#16
Posted 25 January 2013 - 10:32 PM
#17
Posted 25 January 2013 - 10:33 PM
It does break your point because you didn't even mention price in your original post, and I do not see how handheld = not major.
It does not break my point because Battles wasn't a super major game like LCU and handheld stuff is cheaper.lol specifically excluding a game that would otherwise break your point entirely
How so?
This is exactly what is wrong with it.the basic idea of the Wii U is to do the same thing but on a console.
#18
Posted 25 January 2013 - 10:43 PM
I guess I'm sort of going off the point that the Battles games were not as discussed as the TT console games have been, and this has generally been true for the majority of previous LEGO titles (even though most of those were ports, not original games). Overall, this generally seems to be the case with a lot of other stuff, with the main driving point behind a lot of handhelds is being portable entertainment for a lower price than those expensive consoles that stick you to the couch. Obviously there are exceptions, but those are the ones we discuss with more constructive things than "this is a fun game!"It does break your point because you didn't even mention price in your original post, and I do not see how handheld = not major.
I don't know, I've just always seen it that way. Probably something to do with handhelds having lower storage space and power so the game is cheaper in build (again, not saying the gameplay is bad, just that it's not as pricey and fancy).
Because it's just...something. Why would you put a touchscreen in a console controller? Why would you use it without fearing neck pains? This isn't about it being a gimmick like Extreme claims, this is about me viewing it as a poor design choice. I've tried to look at the good side, but something about it just bothers me.How so?
#19
Posted 25 January 2013 - 10:51 PM
#20
Posted 25 January 2013 - 10:53 PM
May I point at all the Mario, Sonic, Pokemon, etc handheld games? Those certainly aren't less important than console games. I dunno how LEGO Battles slipped under the radar for ya, as from what I've seen it got as much promotion as any other classic LEGO game - perhaps it was drowned out by TT's heavily promoted licensed titles?I guess I'm sort of going off the point that the Battles games were not as discussed as the TT console games have been, and this has generally been true for the majority of previous LEGO titles (even though most of those were ports, not original games). Overall, this generally seems to be the case with a lot of other stuff, with the main driving point behind a lot of handhelds is being portable entertainment for a lower price than those expensive consoles that stick you to the couch. Obviously there are exceptions, but those are the ones we discuss with more constructive things than "this is a fun game!"
I don't know, I've just always seen it that way. Probably something to do with handhelds having lower storage space and power so the game is cheaper in build (again, not saying the gameplay is bad, just that it's not as pricey and fancy).
Because it's just...something.
Why not? Seems to me it opens up a lot of new gameplay possibilities.Why would you put a touchscreen in a console controller?
>handheld game systemsWhy would you use it without fearing neck pains?
Yet you called it a gimmick in post #12.This isn't about it being a gimmick like Extreme claims, this is about me viewing it as a poor design choice. I've tried to look at the good side, but something about it just bothers me.
Sign In
Create Account


Back to top


