Jump to content

Photo

"LEGO Marvel Super Heroes" Video Game Announced

LEGO News TT Games Marvel OF COURSE

  • Please log in to reply
20 replies to this topic

#16
Sonic322

Sonic322

    Elite Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,450 posts
I like the game. I like all the TT LEGO games. I think they are all very creative and fun stories with lots of hidden stuff to enjoy.

And just because they use the same engine doesn't mean there isn't new stuff about it. You guys who haven't played the new games look at it as a LEGO Star Wars reskin. It's far from that. They add completely new features into each and every game. You really think they could make LEGO Lord of the Rings on the same exact engine they made LEGO Star Wars on? Are you really that ignorant? Yes all the TT LEGO games look the same but are you really complaining about that? Tell me, please tell me you masters of LEGO. Tell me exactly what you don't like about the games? Is it the minifigs? They could always change them to real looking people. Is it the LEGO world? They could always make it look more realistic and less cartoon looking. Oh hey you know what I just realized about those ideas? It's no longer freaking LEGO! If you guys are going to complain about the TT LEGO games the why don't you provide some actual criticism. If you want LEGO to make their own original game then that's fine. Go sign a petition and send it to them. But you know what you're going to say when you see the games you always loved player in modern graphics? "This looks just like a TT game."


Just because every new LEGO game is made by TT doesn't mean it's just a bad reskin. Just because every new LEGO games theme is something that's popular doesn't mean it's going to be terrible. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean you have to voice your opinion about it as if it were an inarguable fact.

#17
jamesster

jamesster

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,511 posts

I think they are all very creative and fun stories with lots of hidden stuff to enjoy.

Yes they are.

And just because they use the same engine doesn't mean there isn't new stuff about it.

You really think they could make LEGO Lord of the Rings on the same exact engine they made LEGO Star Wars on?

This is self-contradictory.

You guys who haven't played the new games look at it as a LEGO Star Wars reskin. It's far from that. They add completely new features into each and every game.

I have played the new games. It's the same gameplay with a new skin and some new tweaks or features. Fun, yes, but we've been doing the same thing for twelve games over eight years. It's too much of a good thing, and no new feature or movie license can change that. LEGO City: Undercover is finally breaking out of the mold with a non-licensed theme, totally open world gameplay, and heavy focus on sidequests and vehicles, but it's exclusive to Wii U, which a lot of people are skeptical about.

Are you really that ignorant?

Are you?

Yes all the TT LEGO games look the same but are you really complaining about that?

I'm complaining about them looking, feeling, and playing the same over nearly a decade of games.

Tell me, please tell me you masters of LEGO. Tell me exactly what you don't like about the games?

As said, I don't dislike the games, I dislike the unoriginality. It's high-budget shovelware at this point.

Is it the minifigs? They could always change them to real looking people. Is it the LEGO world? They could always make it look more realistic and less cartoon looking. Oh hey you know what I just realized about those ideas? It's no longer freaking LEGO! If you guys are going to complain about the TT LEGO games the why don't you provide some actual criticism. If you want LEGO to make their own original game then that's fine. Go sign a petition and send it to them. But you know what you're going to say when you see the games you always loved player in modern graphics? "This looks just like a TT game."

And here's the part where you go off on some entirely scrambled tangent that has no basis or relevance to the already nonsensical and self-contradictory rant.

Just because every new LEGO game is made by TT doesn't mean it's just a bad reskin.

Nope, not a bad reskin. Just a reskin.

Just because every new LEGO games theme is something that's popular doesn't mean it's going to be terrible.

Again, nobody is claiming the games are terrible or even bad. They're simply recycled and unoriginal.

Just because you don't like it doesn't mean you have to voice your opinion about it as if it were an inarguable fact.

Where was anybody doing this?
  • Lair thanked this

#18
Sonic322

Sonic322

    Elite Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,450 posts


And just because they use the same engine doesn't mean there isn't new stuff about it.

You really think they could make LEGO Lord of the Rings on the same exact engine they made LEGO Star Wars on?

This is self-contradictory.

Yes all the TT LEGO games look the same but are you really complaining about that?

I'm complaining about them looking, feeling, and playing the same over nearly a decade of games.

Tell me, please tell me you masters of LEGO. Tell me exactly what you don't like about the games?

As said, I don't dislike the games, I dislike the unoriginality. It's high-budget shovelware at this point.

Just because every new LEGO games theme is something that's popular doesn't mean it's going to be terrible.

Again, nobody is claiming the games are terrible or even bad. They're simply recycled and unoriginal.

Just because you don't like it doesn't mean you have to voice your opinion about it as if it were an inarguable fact.

Where was anybody doing this?

The first statement is not self-contradictory. I meant do you think they could make LEGO Lord of the Rings on the same exact Engine version they used to make LEGO Star Wars. Of course not.

They're LEGO. You are complaining about the electronic LEGO games made by TT feeling exactly the same as all previous LEGO games they have made. The only reason people don't have that same exact feeling when playing with real LEGOs is because it's hands on. You really have no argument here.

Okay so lets take a took at something original LEGO has made in recent years. A lot of people on RRU dislike Ninjago. Why's that? It's original isn't it? You people always complain about LEGO's new stuff and their licenses and say they are unoriginal. You know what else is unoriginal? Everything you guys like about LEGO that you want them to bring back from the dead. You guys have no idea how self-contradicting that is.

Lair claims the games are terrible all the time.

Once again we have to point to Lair.

#19
jamesster

jamesster

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,511 posts

The first statement is not self-contradictory. I meant do you think they could make LEGO Lord of the Rings on the same exact Engine version they used to make LEGO Star Wars. Of course not.

Ignoring the lack of clarity on your part, you're still stating that making a game bigger or adding more features via progress in technology somehow excuses recycling the same basic gameplay for eight years with no alteration.

They're LEGO. You are complaining about the electronic LEGO games made by TT feeling exactly the same as all previous LEGO games they have made. The only reason people don't have that same exact feeling when playing with real LEGOs is because it's hands on. You really have no argument here.

You seem to be attempting to compare real life LEGO, a system of play and construction that's incredibly open-ended, with a series of video games that have been stuck in the same gameplay rut for eight years, as if the two are somehow related in basic theory and concept.

Okay so lets take a took at something original LEGO has made in recent years. A lot of people on RRU dislike Ninjago. Why's that? It's original isn't it? You people always complain about LEGO's new stuff and their licenses and say they are unoriginal. You know what else is unoriginal? Everything you guys like about LEGO that you want them to bring back from the dead. You guys have no idea how self-contradicting that is.

Again, you're going off on some tangent, this time about LEGO themes, in a discussion about a lack of variety in gameplay over such an extended period of time. Though it is off-topic, I'd like to point out that here you're implying that a theme being original should automatically make it appealing to everybody here. Ninjago is essentially a fusion of everything young boys love: Ninja, skeletons, big vehicles, collectible trading cards, action games, TV shows, etc. It's been a massive success with its target audience, but most of RRU simply doesn't fall into that demographic. Personally, I'm indifferent on Ninjago - I don't dislike it, but it's simply not my cup of tea. Thankfully, LEGO is always trying new themes and concepts, spread out across a wide range of age groups and styles, so there's always something for everyone.

Lair claims the games are terrible all the time.

Once again we have to point to Lair.

He isn't even in this conversation yet, and from when we've talked about this I've gotten the impression he also agrees that the games are fun, but milked to death.
  • Lair thanked this

#20
Lair

Lair

    Toilet Buster

  • Contributors
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,626 posts

Just because every new LEGO games theme is something that's popular doesn't mean it's going to be terrible.

Recycling the exact same gameplay style is terrible, though. It's gotten better recently, but it was getting bland for a while there.

The first statement is not self-contradictory. I meant do you think they could make LEGO Lord of the Rings on the same exact Engine version they used to make LEGO Star Wars. Of course not.

And yet, from the gameplay I've seen, they have. It's not exactly the same (it hasn't been ever since they made BIONCILE Heroes on a heavily modified version) but it's still the same sort of engine, same sort of gameplay, same sort of feel. Upgraded, but the same at heart.

They're LEGO. You are complaining about the electronic LEGO games made by TT feeling exactly the same as all previous LEGO games they have made.

Because they do.

The only reason people don't have that same exact feeling when playing with real LEGOs is because it's hands on. You really have no argument here.

Uh, yeah we do? Physical LEGO products have nothing to do with TT LEGO games.

A lot of people on RRU dislike Ninjago. Why's that? It's original isn't it?

No. It's a giant melting pot of what Jamesster said in his above post. Plus, something being original doesn't mean it's good.

You people always complain about LEGO's new stuff and their licenses and say they are unoriginal.

I don't, and I know not everyone else here does either. Most of the complaining is about licensed themes, with negative comments on other themes being mostly about weird choices in story and cheesy set design.

You know what else is unoriginal? Everything you guys like about LEGO that you want them to bring back from the dead.

How, exactly? I would very much like to know.

Lair claims the games are terrible all the time. Once again we have to point to Lair.

Firstly, I can claim my opinion as whatever I want. Second, I never made any such claim. I think they're terrible for recycling the gameplay, that doesn't mean the game can't be fun:

from when we've talked about this I've gotten the impression he also agrees that the games are fun, but milked to death.

I do have a lot of negativity to say, but if I hated them so much then why would I own most of the LEGO games they have made?

How did I even get randomly inserted into this discussion anyway?
  • jamesster thanked this

#21
LimeKiller

LimeKiller

    I guess you should go with Alyx.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 289 posts
I think I'm about to cry....

Of boredom or something, I guess.



Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: LEGO News, TT Games, Marvel, OF COURSE